Why Might It Be That We Cannot Build Fuel-Efficient Vehicles? Post 34.18

Around one third of new car purchasers in America considered fuel economy an important factor.. Way back in 1992 already General Motors built a vehicle that got 100 miles to the gallon – and all these years later one of people’s major concerns on top of global warming and pollution is dependence on foreign oil. The GM TPC became a car that was able to get 75 miles per gallon, weighed about 1000 pounds, and looked like the Geo Metro. However, as a way to meet American safety regulations, the 3-cylinder vehicle required reinforcement weighing 200 pounds, which resulted in further development being discarded.

This is certainly not the only protype designed by GM which ended up on the scrapheap. A number of these were the 1982 GM Lean Machine which performed 80 miles per gallon, and the GM Ultralite which made 100 mpg. GM was offering cars to the purchasing public in 1992 that did 20 mpg, while Honda was getting 50 mpg with their Civic VX, but right then GM already covertly had cars doing 100 miles per gallon. Undoubtedly this begs the question that explains why these cars that are capable of 100 mpg are not available to the public.

An additional puzzling thing is that many companies, while selling fuel-eficient vehicles in foreign countries, are selling traditional gas guzzlers in the US. These few considerations will make a difference in your knowledge as they relate to programs for Biomedical Engineering. Of course we strongly recommend you discover more about them. It is difficult to determine all the different means by which they can serve you. Once your knowledge is more complete, then you will feel more self-confident about the subject. We are not done, and there are just a couple of very strong suggestions and tips for you. Consumers in Japan and Europe have for quite some time now managed to get cars that do 70 miles per gallon and more. A case in point of a vehicle never marketed within the US and capable of 78 mpg, is the Lupo by Volkswagen. In 2007, Honda in the US released the FIT, elsewhere known as the Jazz. You can get economy-boosting options with the Jazz in Japan, like a smaller engine and other ways to reduce consumption, but not so with the Fit in the US.

In America the manufacturers claim they have to build big cars because that is what the American public wants. Building a small commuter type vehicle doesn’t make the manfacturer big money, unlike with a large SUV. A Tank on Wheels may be the thing to get – that’s the message that the commercials beguile the American public with. It is quite obvious where the large companies’ interests lay when you consider that they have never offered options. GM could right now have been in the forefront with fuel-efficient vehicles, but they elected, rather, to champion SUVs. The rest of the car makers did the same thing by producing fuel-efficient cars, and then denied them to Americans.

We all live in a world that has conducted wars over oil, that has been polluted, and car makers have never even given the choice to people in this country of fuel-efficient cars. How many people would’ve loved having a car that got good gas mileage, and were never given the option? Maybe the time has come to revive building those cars that were developed only to be abandoned all those years ago.

Really tough to Get The Right Career when you want? You will probably be surprised to see just how much BIOMEDICAL Engineering school plays a function.